Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the dominant ATS in tech and startups. Unlike most platforms, it does NOT auto-score or auto-reject candidates. It’s built around structured human review with scorecards.
Key Facts
Section titled “Key Facts”| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Vendor | Greenhouse |
| Market Share | Tech & startups |
| Parser | LLM-based (most modern) |
| Keyword Strategy | Semantic (LLM-based) |
| Strictness | Low |
| Auto-Reject | No (by design) |
Parsing Behavior
Section titled “Parsing Behavior”Greenhouse recently transitioned to an LLM-based parser:
- Most modern parser of any major ATS. Uses large language models for extraction.
- Handles creative formats better than any other platform. Tables, columns, and graphics don’t break it.
- Deep semantic understanding. Can infer skills from context even if not explicitly listed.
- No automated scoring or ranking. Every resume gets human eyes.
- Structured scorecards are the primary evaluation mechanism. Interviewers rate candidates on predefined criteria.
Scoring Weights
Section titled “Scoring Weights”Since Greenhouse doesn’t auto-score, our simulation reflects how well your resume presents to human reviewers using the platform:
| Dimension | Weight | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Formatting | 10% | LLM parser handles anything |
| Keyword Match | 20% | Semantic, very forgiving |
| Section Completeness | 15% | Helps reviewers navigate |
| Experience Relevance | 35% | Humans focus on this |
| Education | 20% | Reviewed manually |
Tips for Greenhouse
Section titled “Tips for Greenhouse”- Focus on storytelling. Since humans review every resume, compelling narratives matter more than keyword stuffing.
- Quantify impact with specific numbers. Reviewers using scorecards look for evidence.
- Tailor your summary/objective to the company. Greenhouse reviewers read more carefully than automated systems.
- Creative formatting is okay here (unlike Workday/Taleo), but don’t overdo it.
- Highlight culture fit signals. Greenhouse companies value team dynamics.